User:Robbie: Difference between revisions

From Technology Committee Bricolage Lab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(65 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Robbie McClintock
== Robbie's User Page[s] ==
{{tcbl}}
=== A personal profile for the Tech committee ===


Reactions to the Key activities section of the draft Windrows long term tech plan
<p style="text-indent: 0.13in">After a long academic career, I am living in Princeton, New Jersey, to study and write about the cultural effects of education and technology and to prototype culturally effective uses of digital technologies.  </p>


==== '''Key activities''': [What can and should we do?] ====
<p style="text-indent: 0.13in">My interests formed as I earned my B.A. with high honors at Princeton University (1957-61) and my Ph.D. at Columbia University (1961-68). Thanks to a good job market, I joined the faculty at the Johns Hopkins University as an Assistant Professor in 1965, and I then moved to the faculty at Teachers College, Columbia University, in 1967. In 2002, I became the John L. and Sue Ann Weinberg Professor in the Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Education there, and 10 years later I retired to study and write full-time.</p>
<div style="margin-top: 20px;">[[file:Robbie-with-head-phones-300w.png|right|150px]]<div>
<p style="text-indent: 0.13in">As an undergraduate, I became interested in formative education as an agent of cultural change and that topic has remained central to my work. To further this interest, I initially studied the history of political and educational theory and the cultural significance of information and communications technologies. Jacques Barzun and Lawrence A. Cremin sponsored my dissertation, an intellectual biography of José Ortega y Gasset, which the Teachers College Press published as [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/gz9vcxwkakizjcmiyqtd7/1971-Man-and-Circumstances-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=zdjrwdg8a2o01629mtmyobk3s&amp;dl=0 Man and His Circumstances: Ortega as Educator] in 1971. Through the 1970s, writing essays like [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/17xqp3inppj2e90okrfu9/1971-Place-for-Study-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=4ebeedcs47v4mtr2po6e5o18q&amp;dl=0 "Towards a Place for Study in a World of Instruction"] and [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i88ikb7pcmyi7lm1dktvg/1979-Dynamics-Decline-Education-1979.pdf?rlkey=uibdh7dc7jjf0f7do07vr6abc&amp;dl=0 "The Dynamics of Decline: Why Education Can No Longer Be Liberal"], I developed the view that humanistic educators should try to use digital technologies as disruptive historical forces to strengthen the cultural power of formative education.  </p>


# Monitoring the functioning and content of the resident website, recommending improvements and offering seminars to residents on how to access and use the website. ['''''I've monitored it since before coming to Windrows 3 years ago. The public facing parts maintained by the real estate office were helpful. The functioning of resident oriented parts are stiff, off-putting, and unresponsive. The content is boring, too likely to be inaccurate and out-of-date, and it neither occasions, requires, or rewards activity by residents. Until residents have reasons to access the website, seminars on how to access and use the website will have little effect.''']''
<p style="text-indent: 0.13in">To further that goal at TC, I organized the [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tmsnr0b84oa1cyns1oq1o/1999-ILT-Plan-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=nq7a825ov4w9hahfkhpbodc43&amp;dl=0 Institute for Learning Technologies] (ILT) in 1984 and directed it until 2002, prototyping advanced curricular resources for use over the Internet. Acting on my ideas about education and historical change, I developed [https://www.dropbox.com/home/0-Gesamtschriften-Robbie?preview=1990-The-Cumulative-Curriculum-Multi-Media-and-the-Making-of-a-New-Educational-System.pdf The Cumulative Curriculum Proposal] (1990-91), which led to two large projects — [https://www.dropbox.com/home/0-Gesamtschriften-Robbie?di=left_nav_browse&amp;preview=1992-Risk-and-Renewal-Dalton-Year-1-Summaries.pdf The Dalton Technology Plan] (1991–1996) and [https://www.dropbox.com/home/0-Gesamtschriften-Robbie?di=left_nav_browse&amp;preview=1996_Eiffel-Project-1-1-McClintock.pdf The Eiffel Project]  (1996–2001). I raised over $20 million in gifts and grants to prototype places for study in New York City schools, public and private, and in Columbia University. In two online essays, I wrote about digital technologies as agents of cultural change, [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jaa81sfrqpd2dgwe5f6q6/1992-Power-and-Pedagogy-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=11m299rgo5d5dzjfw2bsmwk4v&amp;dl=0 Power and Pedagogy] (1992) and [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/um8rmmmxbd1gg6j2n43wu/1999-Manifesto-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=15j1hebdi721jd57j05bfcy83&amp;dl=0 The Educators Manifesto] (1999), and on the eve of the dot-com crash, I wrote [https://www.dropbox.com/home/0-Gesamtschriften-Robbie?di=left_nav_browse&amp;preview=2000-Smart-Cities-New-York-McClintock-1.pdf# Smart Cities — New York:  Electronic Education for the New Millennium] (2000), the pedagogical rationale for a very large, ill-fated initiative under-taken by the NYC Board of Education, Accenture, and a consortium of major tech companies.</p>
# Responding to requests for technical assistance from other resident committees by either providing direct assistance, or by directing residents to others able to help. ['''''Responding to requests won't hack it. The tech committee should work with the chairs and select members of other committees to design, implement, and encourage use of online resources that will facilitate work by the members of other committees.''''']
 
# Develop and implement programs to help boost residents’ comfort with using technology and bolster their technological literacy. ['''''As of mid-May, the online directory of residents lists 327 persons. Many of them are uncomfortable using technology and choose not to do so. Development and implementation resources are scarce and we should not expend them in remedial efforts directed at them. We should devote our development and implementation efforts to the large middle ground of residents who are comfortable and literate but find the technological opportunities at Windrows uninspiring and not very useful.]'''''
<div class="inbox" style="align: center; width: 400px; text-align: center;">In "The Accidental Technologist," Joe Levine profiled my technology work in the context of my career.<br>
# Monitoring the functioning of technology used throughout Windrows to ensure that it is operating correctly and working with staff to correct problems. ['''''Is the poor operation of what we currently have the limiting factor with communication and technology at Windrows? We need to extend the current functioning and make it all more interesting. What might we do within the scale of resources we can muster?''''']
[https://www.tc.columbia.edu/articles/2010/december/the-accidental-technologist/ <i>TC Today</i>, December 2010].</p></div>
# Researching and recommending technologies that could:
 
## Improve the efficiency or lower the cost of regularly-occurring procedures at Windrows, with a particular focus on communications. ['''''Is this consistent with the often-voiced concern to make Windrows technologically attractive to younger potential residents? Are there important possibilities that don't regularly occur at present?]''''']
<p style="text-indent: 0.13in">Over the past 20 years, I’ve stayed away from market-driven innovation to concentrate on scholarship and technical initiatives “for their own sake.” In [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/hwto8no5s4dryqn80mjnt/2005-Homeless-Intellect-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=85rlwd3hx28czrpw7juhl99yw&amp;dl=0 <i>Homeless in the House of Intellect: Formative Justice and Education as an Academic Study</i>] (2005), I explored the special importance the academic study of education had at a time when the radical transformation of educational institutions was getting underway. In [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/swqby2yfm80k20knhtxrj/2012-Enough-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=zdddnknc3365wagig8j7q0jxf&amp;dl=0 <i>Enough: A Pedagogic Speculation</i>] (2012), I criticized present-day thinking about education and public life from an imagined perspective, far in the future, when <i>enough</i>, neither <i>too much nor too little</i>, had supplanted the principle of <i>more</i> as the basis for exercising judgment and legitimating authority. Subsequently, I published an extended essay — [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d3l0f720x75hwi2zqbre9/2019-Formative-Justice-published-paperback.pdf?rlkey=esbx65twjy1wzkc7cdsz18gts&dl=0 <i>Formative Justice</i>] (2019) — that brings the speculations put forward in <i>Enough</i> more concretely into the contemporary context. Since 2019, I have labored to prototype a digital correlate to the personal study or studio that cultured persons with means have used as favored workspaces for many generations — <i><b>a place to study</b></i>. Now the first prototype is offline, a second will go online early 2025.</p>
## Facilitate residents’ participation in Windrows life while they are both on campus and away. '''''[Yes, but @c below.]'''''
 
## Facilitate online communication between residents. '''''[Yes, but to what degree do we need to pay more attention to the interaction between residents online and external online communities and resources?]'''''
<p style="text-indent: 0.13in">Presently, I’m depressed by the level of anger in us all, and a bit skeptical about the AI buzz. I’ve always thought AI should stand for <b>Augmenting</b> the <b>Intelligence</b> we use to nurture our human fulfillment, an intent I long ago voiced in the <i>American Scholar</i> through “[https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yfb0xr9n560ixr6020kxe/1966-Machines-and-Vitalists-McClintock.pdf?rlkey=czywwdn8m7asggjx9s9xigsy8&amp;dl=0 Machines and Vitalists: Reflections on the Ideology of Cybernetics]” (1966).</p>
## Improve energy efficiency. '''''[Of course, but is it our proper focus? Buildings and grounds?]'''''
 
# Working with the Board and Staff to develop long-term technology goals and implementation plans; developing data necessary for evaluating progress toward achieving these goals. '''''[Should we include concerns about Purpose and Human Agency in framing our activities and in evaluating their effectiveness? Do organizational goals and plans generate sufficient aspirational effort?]'''''
<p style="font-style: normal; text-indent: 0.13in">Still much to do. Here’s to the future!</p>
#Implementing a Bi-annual technology satisfaction and need survey among residents and staff.
 
I want to close by asking about the actual activities we should expect to engage in as members of the Technology Committee. In my experience, still brief at Windrows, participation in Advisory Committees is pretty laid back. The Chair[s] do the bulk of the work and participants show up once a month for a one-hour meeting, primarily to comment lightly on the Chair's work or to participate in a walk-around to understand better the service they nominally oversee. Somewhere I picked up the notion that Service committees were different, that all the members participated in producing some deliverables, i.e., members of the Gray Gardens Service Committee garden and manage the gardening of others who sign up for a plot.
<p align="right" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
[mailto:robbie@aplacetostudy.org robbie@aplacetostudy.org]<br/>4 Green Leaf Court<br/>Princeton, NJ 08540<br/>646 464-4531</p>

Latest revision as of 12:17, 15 June 2024

Robbie's User Page[s][edit | edit source]

Tech Committee
Bricolage Lab

A personal profile for the Tech committee[edit | edit source]

After a long academic career, I am living in Princeton, New Jersey, to study and write about the cultural effects of education and technology and to prototype culturally effective uses of digital technologies.

My interests formed as I earned my B.A. with high honors at Princeton University (1957-61) and my Ph.D. at Columbia University (1961-68). Thanks to a good job market, I joined the faculty at the Johns Hopkins University as an Assistant Professor in 1965, and I then moved to the faculty at Teachers College, Columbia University, in 1967. In 2002, I became the John L. and Sue Ann Weinberg Professor in the Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Education there, and 10 years later I retired to study and write full-time.

As an undergraduate, I became interested in formative education as an agent of cultural change and that topic has remained central to my work. To further this interest, I initially studied the history of political and educational theory and the cultural significance of information and communications technologies. Jacques Barzun and Lawrence A. Cremin sponsored my dissertation, an intellectual biography of José Ortega y Gasset, which the Teachers College Press published as Man and His Circumstances: Ortega as Educator in 1971. Through the 1970s, writing essays like "Towards a Place for Study in a World of Instruction" and "The Dynamics of Decline: Why Education Can No Longer Be Liberal", I developed the view that humanistic educators should try to use digital technologies as disruptive historical forces to strengthen the cultural power of formative education.

To further that goal at TC, I organized the Institute for Learning Technologies (ILT) in 1984 and directed it until 2002, prototyping advanced curricular resources for use over the Internet. Acting on my ideas about education and historical change, I developed The Cumulative Curriculum Proposal (1990-91), which led to two large projects — The Dalton Technology Plan (1991–1996) and The Eiffel Project (1996–2001). I raised over $20 million in gifts and grants to prototype places for study in New York City schools, public and private, and in Columbia University. In two online essays, I wrote about digital technologies as agents of cultural change, Power and Pedagogy (1992) and The Educators Manifesto (1999), and on the eve of the dot-com crash, I wrote Smart Cities — New York: Electronic Education for the New Millennium (2000), the pedagogical rationale for a very large, ill-fated initiative under-taken by the NYC Board of Education, Accenture, and a consortium of major tech companies.

In "The Accidental Technologist," Joe Levine profiled my technology work in the context of my career.
TC Today, December 2010.

Over the past 20 years, I’ve stayed away from market-driven innovation to concentrate on scholarship and technical initiatives “for their own sake.” In Homeless in the House of Intellect: Formative Justice and Education as an Academic Study (2005), I explored the special importance the academic study of education had at a time when the radical transformation of educational institutions was getting underway. In Enough: A Pedagogic Speculation (2012), I criticized present-day thinking about education and public life from an imagined perspective, far in the future, when enough, neither too much nor too little, had supplanted the principle of more as the basis for exercising judgment and legitimating authority. Subsequently, I published an extended essay — Formative Justice (2019) — that brings the speculations put forward in Enough more concretely into the contemporary context. Since 2019, I have labored to prototype a digital correlate to the personal study or studio that cultured persons with means have used as favored workspaces for many generations — a place to study. Now the first prototype is offline, a second will go online early 2025.

Presently, I’m depressed by the level of anger in us all, and a bit skeptical about the AI buzz. I’ve always thought AI should stand for Augmenting the Intelligence we use to nurture our human fulfillment, an intent I long ago voiced in the American Scholar through “Machines and Vitalists: Reflections on the Ideology of Cybernetics” (1966).

Still much to do. Here’s to the future!

robbie@aplacetostudy.org
4 Green Leaf Court
Princeton, NJ 08540
646 464-4531